Skip to main content

New announcement. Learn more

TAGS

You already know the problems - knowing which one to fix first is the important first step

Your business strategy should be supported by technology, and yet it surprises me how often there are big gaps between what the business needs and what technology provides. 

I've spoken to lots of local CEOs and when we talk about how well their technology supports their business I don’t need to prompt them - they can list the problems - they can be very painful and expensive. 

Here is a relevant example: We recently came across a very successful manufacturer who clearly understood the problems they were having. An old and poorly implemented ERP system mean lots of workarounds to run their business. Each of these took time and had the potential to add errors and delays to business information, making it hard to manage the business and grow without the leverage effect of good systems. His major problem – “I don’t know what to do first.” 

As business conditions improve, what to spend capital on is a critical decision. You already know most of the problems at a business level and have a good feel for what they are costing in terms of revenue, margin or customer perception. 

Here is what I’ve heard from local CEOs here in Canterbury: 

Business problem - What this looks like in your business 

Missing or untracked margin:
You can't see where margin is being lost in your processes. 

Difficulty managing the business:
Critical management decisions can’t be made because information from your business processes arrives too late to make changes.  

Data errors and complexity:
Your data is being manually entered from one system to another, often a spreadsheet, to complete business logic, then back again to complete a process. This is complex, potentially introduces errors and is time consuming. 

Technology doesn’t scale:
When you receive new orders that increase production or services, your technology systems don’t scale meaning your staff costs escalate to compensate. 

Keeping competitive:
You are concerned about keeping up or leading your industry. A symptom of this is your staff complaining about systems not doing enough even though they run well. 

Over promised or missing benefits:
Technology promises have failed to deliver all the benefits they were bought for within a reasonable timeframe or budget. 

Senior leaders know the challenges but are unsure of what to tackle first, what options exist, what will move the business forward fastest, and how these stack up against other investment decisions the business must make. There are two core reasons for this: 

1 - Business change outpacing technology investment: 

  • With the multiple demands on a business’s capital, if technology improvements aren’t brought to senior executives as investment options to improve outcomes, they can be deprioritised and technology may fall behind 

  • Businesses continually evolve. Without ongoing investment, technology gradually falls out of step with changing processes, customer expectations and growth requirements. 

2 - Technology decisions don’t create the expected outcomes: 

  • Some IT staff and/or suppliers focus on ‘keeping systems going’ and minimising risk. This is a natural thing to do, particularly with critical systems, but it comes at the cost of minimising change and by extension, business improvement  

  • Technology improvements can be presented as multiple “problems or risks”. If these aren’t prioritised against cost, benefit and the ability to move a business forward they will be delayed 

  • A poor initial implementation or ‘oversold’ features mean the solution is underperforming compared with expectations and the business compensates with workarounds 

These are difficult decisions 

The traditional answer has been to upgrade or replace systems. It can seem the most obvious thing to do, and for some businesses it is. However, upgrading your system is expensive, resource intensive and time consuming. Often, more expensive, resource intensive and time consuming than ever expected! Business is littered with examples of failed or partially failed system changes.  For example, Gartner estimates that more than 70% of recently implemented ERP initiatives will fail to fully meet their original business use case goals, and as many as 25% will fail catastrophically (Gartner research 2024, What IT Leaders Must Do to Avoid Disappointing ERP Initiatives).    

Many New Zealand businesses underestimate the impact of this change on their business, often with software suppliers unable to adequately explain the effort and cost to achieve benefits. Even with relatively straightforward technology solutions it is simply beyond the knowledge and experience of many businesses to properly anticipate the impact of a system change on your existing technology system and the staff who will use them. 

 You may struggle to know where to start because the problems can be many and span across systems. This has been made more difficult in recent years with the introduction of very capable systems, purchased monthly, which business processes become dependent on. 

Making the investment case stack up 

The most important principle is to view the changes as business improvements. Find the projects that move your business forward and justify the costs against other investment decisions that must be made. Prioritise by considering:  

  • How each of these would move the business forward if it was fixed  

  • The IT effort to fix them  

  • The impact on staff. 

Here are steps that help businesses make confident decisions that move their business forward: 

We recommend the following five steps to help you make confident investment decisions  

  1. Focus on the business improvement you want to achieve, the outcome 

  2. Prioritise. We see often companies take on too much. It is a default position with many supplier led application upgrades. If at all possible, do not do everything at once. Consider the whole, then prioritise based on the ability to move your business forward, the IT costs and staff change impact 

  3. Manage risks. Be aware it is easy to underestimate effort and cost: plan for this 

  4. Justify. Use return on investment to rank the costs of improvement against the improvement to your business. Then weigh this against doing nothing - the cost of inaction 

  5. Develop this as a model for improvement: take one problem, figure out the problem in detail, cost it, develop what it would mean to fix it, then rank this against your other business investment decisions. Do it again. 

 

This prioritised, incremental approach that moves your business forward at a pace you, your staff and your business can stand has many advantages: 

  • Business improvement happens where you need it most  

  • The business process re-engineering is managed in one place with limited staff impact 

  • The cost is justified against a real problem 

  • The incremental approach means the business can check the result then learn, improve the model and move to the next opportunity. 
     

The AI benefit 

AI has changed the economics of process improvement, which means fixes that previously couldn't be justified may now meet your criteria. That's a big change. It’s not the technology itself, but what it does to the ROI calculation. 

According to Newswire, around 82% of New Zealand businesses now use AI in some form, yet national productivity has gone backwards over the same period. The reason is that most have added AI to processes they never changed. The firms seeing genuine returns are the ones that redesigned how the work is done first. This returns us to selecting the right processes to improve and using modern tools and methods to improve them. 

Clarity and confidence with independence 

Edge Consulting is an experience-led, independent business consultancy that focuses on technology solutions. We work with businesses to solve business problems with technology. We work with you at your pace to take you from where you are now to meet your business outcomes. 

Interested to know more?
Get in touch with Kerry at Edge Consulting (+64 21 436550) or David Ferkatovich (+64 27 555 5112) for further details on our Strategic Technology Consulting see our website.